Bobby Hershey Peer Edit

Peer review sheet for 3ResProj

Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110

Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project

Reviewers name:  Christopher Lucas

Paper author’s name:  Bobby Hershey

Has the writer written a research paper . . .

[medium]

_X _that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?

__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?

__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?

__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.

Comment:  Overall the paper presents a good argument, while using facts to back up all statements.

[opening & introduction]

_X_that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?

Comment:   Paper presents an introduction and a forecast.

[use of research question & thesis]

_X_where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?

Comment:

[use of sources]

_X_where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?

[paragraph construction]

_X_that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?

Comment:

[conclusion]

_X_that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?

Comment:

[works cited and in-text citations]

_X_that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?

Comment:

Works cited page needs work.

[sentence-level rhetoric]

_X_where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?

Comment: